Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?

[Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>]

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
>
>> Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> writes:
>>
>>> Is that an indication that the WG did really want to allow relative 
>>> URIs
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Oops -- should be 'No' -- it's there to allow absolute+fragid.

I am entirely missing the logic behind wanting to allow a fragid in a 
base URI.

Jonathan