[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> At 2:54 PM -0500 1/23/04, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
>
> Hmm, did you really mean to send this to the xml-dev list?
Nope, a slip of the brain.
> >2.14: Using parse="text" and an xpointer should mean that whatever
> >the xpointer
> >points to is converted to text and included as such.
>
> Regardless, I will comment on point 2.14. This is very tricky because
> the XPointer will typically be resolved through an API such as DOM,
> JDOM, SAX, or XOM that does not provide full access to the original
> text content.
You make a very good point. Of course 2.14 was yours in the first place.
> (Hmm, is
> there a fragment identifier type defined for text/plain?)
There is not, though Erik Wilde has an Internet-Draft proposing one.
Furthermore, there is no fragid type defined for text/xml or
application/xml, either.
--
Long-short-short, long-short-short / Dactyls in dimeter,
Verse form with choriambs / (Masculine rhyme): jcowan@reutershealth.com
One sentence (two stanzas) / Hexasyllabically http://www.reutershealth.com
Challenges poets who / Don't have the time. --robison who's at texas dot net
|
