Lists Home |
Date Index |
So the customer isn't pulling. They are stumbling
and grabbing onto the nearest thing to right themselves.
Do the editors come with online help, as in bubble help
Could any of you fill in your tax forms without the
instructions? Would you if you knew the probability
was very high that the IRS would reject them?
You are right if it means adding more fields to
pick off all the possible error combinations,
but some features are better than others and
no form or editor should be fielded without
user instructions for the semantics.
They will still put the garbage data in there,
From: Joshua Allen [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> date that it was last modified. So, users get entries that appear to
> be "old" even when they are "new." This confuses them. The issue here
> has *nothing* to do with data format -- it is a question of semantics,
My experience shows exactly the opposite; people report "new" when
actually a post is old. But in any case, I fail to see how adding
another field will stop people from putting the wrong dates in those
fields -- the semantics of "pubDate" are remarkably clear, and people
still screw it up. I would bet that in 99% of cases, people screw it up
because they don't know better, NOT because "pubDate is the only field
available and I really, really, want to store the last-update date in
Solving user ignorance by adding more features is not very smart.