[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 10:10 AM -0700 4/13/04, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
>Yes, the question is how fast this stuff - text XML - can be
>generated. I'm interested in XML interchange costs, which includes
>both the input and output processing overhead as well as the actual
>document size. In order to give a comparison that's as fair as
>possible I'm using SAX2 parse event streams as the common base
>document representation, which also corresponds to actual usage - if
>you were using XBIS as the transport for an XML document
>representation between programs you'd generally do so by plugging in
>an encoder that takes the place of text serialization at the sending
>end and a decoder that takes the place of a parser at the receiving
>end.
If that's the case, I suspect your fastest output would just come
with the appropriate write() method in OutputStream or Writer. Why
use a fancy API at all?
Now, of course, if performance isn't the be-all and end-all then
there may be advantages to using an API, but likely the fastest
output will be achieved with the most direct approach.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
|
