OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] Web Services/SOA (was RE: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
  • Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Web Services/SOA (was RE: [xml-dev] XML 2004 weblog items?)
  • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:42:21 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=J9wtswpBifGMefCbcHrh5xvQjm6/Oa1SMdkIvpwTR3LMRm/nx0Dnj4OtsnhcE1YIpSvLGRaICQxRFTKb8dqSL0q+3hDjvSA5Ol+EGih7D5OATiG9J8tCt8iui7eoKZ0pDRboeQsZDFQixl4NSByVDkSYVKV6KSvR4G7k3E0FcJk=
  • In-reply-to: <20041201205838.GN3016@markbaker.ca>
  • References: <20041130025726.GJ3016@markbaker.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0411292204040.9116-100000@smtp.datapower.com> <20041130054325.GK3016@markbaker.ca> <41ADF4B5.2040503@datapower.com> <20041201205838.GN3016@markbaker.ca>
  • Reply-to: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:58:38 -0500, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
 
> > >Practically all the Web services I've seen deployed on the Internet
> > >(via xmethods.net) is RPC too.
> >
> > So what?
> 
> Well, I think it means that many well-intentioned developers, who want
> to contribute to the Web services vision, aren't being given a
> consistent (or even coherent) message about how exactly they should go
> about doing that.  

IMHO the modern "web services vision" is that web services are
*technologies* that don't imply a consistent message about how they
should be used.  One can use SOAP/WSDL to support plain-ol' RPC,
distributed object architectures, or services oriented architectures. 
With WS-Transfer or a roll-your-own SOAP format, one can use them to
support an essentially RESTful architecture.

That's the main reason (at least in 20/20 hindsight) for the WS
Architecture working group not continuing on a Recommendation path: it
concluded that there is no "Web Services Architecture", although there
are clearly multiple architectural patterns that can be implemented
using web services.




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS