xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of theNVDL

Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of theNVDL

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of theNVDL FCD
From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:47:33 -0800
Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <41FB1A83.7080704@rpbourret.com>
References: <200501272137.j0RLbQW21036@smtp-bedford.mitre.org> <41F972D9.5000507@objfac.com> <41FB1A83.7080704@rpbourret.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

Ronald Bourret wrote:
> Which is a shame. Having, for example, to rewrite the XHTML schema just 
> so I can include SVG fragments makes building compound documents almost 
> impossibly difficult. I suspect we need to think about more types of 
> validity than those currently offered by DTDs, XML Schemas, Schematron, 
> and RELAX NG.

It would be, but I was wrong. Read Rick Jelliffe's reply.

Bob Foster

References:
- Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of the NVDL FCD
  - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of theNVDL FCD
  - From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of theNVDL FCD
  - From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of theNVDL FCD
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Compound Documents? RE: [xml-dev] Announcement of the NVDL FCD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread