Lists Home |
Date Index |
Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Toni Uusitalo <email@example.com> was heard to say:
> | Yes. I tested with the current version - It works. But I think the
> | point still remains - it's not easy to get the DTD parameter entity
> | expansion right ;-)
> I don't think XML 2.0 parser writers will have to worry about getting
> parameter entity expansion right.
Well, they'll probably have to worry about getting XML 1.x right though,
so from the implementation side the problem won't really go away.
> I'd be stunned if any DTD syntax survived any revision of XML.
Surely you jest, at its F2F last week the XBC WG resolved that none of
our use cases could be addressed without binary ATTLISTs and NOTATIONs.
We need them in XML 2.0!
Robin Berjon *ducks*