OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Norman Walsh wrote:
> 3. Something that works for a well-defined set of strings that can
>    be defined by some mechanism external to an individual document
>    but also inside a particular document. Something that has all
>    the features of general parsed entities.

One radical idea would be to define parseable entities in XML, in a 
separate entity namespace, using a simple first-definition-wins rule and 
XInclude for the external ones. I wonder why nobody's proposed that? Oh, 
wait, a number of people have proposed that. They just get slapped 
around here until they go away. ;-}

Bob Foster

> As I said, I don't think an XML 2.0 is worth pursuing if we select 0
> From this list.
> I am concerned that 3 is going to be quite complex and highly
> controversial because just as there are large communities that *need*
> entities, there are large communities that have no need for them
> whatsoever.
> The really hard, open question to my mind is, where's the 80/20 cut?
> Between 1 and 2 or between 2 and 3? (Possibly it's after 3, but my
> intuition says that it may not be.)
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS