[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
William,
On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:20 pm, William J. Kammerer wrote:
> Is this a trick question? The logical NOT sign is NOT missing. I
> assume you mean the "¬" symbol. It can't be missing from Unicode -
> otherwise I couldn't have placed it in this e-mail using ordinary ISO
> 8879-1 (a.k.a. Latin-1). It's x00AC (or "U+00AC").
imo that's an ugly character, the "¬" symbol. Even uglier than
my "Ya" text.... :-)
Given the following:
a) <SomeChick>
really_ugly?=True
</SomeChick>
or
a) <SomeChick>
really_ugly?=¬
</SomeChick>
I have my own opinion about which is more readable. Maybe the
second one is more polite and less likely to cause violence, I
don't know..... there is an argument for safety in obscurity....
David
--
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.
|
