xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom

Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:44:39 -0800
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org,"William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@novannet.com>
In-reply-to: <200503041246.09177.david.lyon@computergrid.net>
References: <032801c52058$628a0330$c970fea9@CMHNovannet> <200503041246.09177.david.lyon@computergrid.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

David Lyon wrote:

> imo that's an ugly character, the  "¬" symbol. Even uglier than
> my "Ya" text.... :-)
> 
> Given the following:
> 
>  a) <SomeChick>
>       really_ugly?=True
>     </SomeChick>
> 
> or
> 
>  a) <SomeChick>
>       really_ugly?=¬
>     </SomeChick>

No, sorry. Yours is uglier.

Bob Foster

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
  - From: David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
  - From: "William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@novannet.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
  - From: David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread