xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from

RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'David Lyon'" <david.lyon@computergrid.net>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:56:11 -0000
Cc: "'William J. Kammerer'" <wkammerer@novannet.com>
In-reply-to: <200503041246.09177.david.lyon@computergrid.net>
Thread-index: AcUgWr9i8a+kKQZ8QC6pjrrui7pbPAARQLiA

> imo that's an ugly character, the  "¬" symbol. 

Hey, that's a good way to keep the size of Unicode down. We'll only allow
characters that no-one thinks are ugly.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
  - From: David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS