xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom

Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
From: Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:53:17 +1100
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <E1D7Kat-0001TJ-00@ukmail1.eechost.net>
Organization: Zenucom Pty Ltd
References: <E1D7Kat-0001TJ-00@ukmail1.eechost.net>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Michael Kay wrote:

>my suggestion would be a-z 
>
>wh nds vwls?
>
>MHK
>
>
>
>!DSPAM:4228d6b6205701820420276!
>
>  
>
ntrstng pnt

persnlly i find usng the first vowl only maks the sentnce mor redbl

is y a vowl? and we probbly dont ned h ethr

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@zenucom.com
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
  - From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Tamino status
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT ismissing from the UCS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread