OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

>>We would all like these numbers. What percentage of XML is:
>>- Hand-authored?
>>- Program-generated?
>>- Used for data exchange?
>>- Used to generate publications?
>>Of the hand-authored XML, what percentage is written using tools that:
>>- Expose POT (plain old text)?
>>- Edit only the infoset (like form editors)?
>>- Edit only the infoset plus entities (like WYSIWYG XHTML editors, 
>>structure editors)?

While it would be interesting to know that, it's not particularly 
important. Even if the percentage of documents that is hand-authored is 
small, that's still a large percentage of the work we do. Computers can 
be taught to handle the parts of XML needed for human use more easily 
than humans can be taught to think in binary.

Taking away text XML and the pieces of XML intended to make human 
authoring feasible is like welding shut the hood of a car. Sure, 99 
times out of a 100 you can drive your car to the grocery store without 
opening the hood. But the ability to open the hood when you need to is 
necessary to avoid being a slave to a priesthood of mechanics with 
special welding tools. We need to make it possible for humans to pop 
open the hoods of their XML documents to perform routine maintenance 
when necessary, without needing special tools and training.

Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS