[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Paul Thorpe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2005, Michael Kay wrote:
>
>
>>>The TAG has posted an opinion on XML Binary Format:
>>>
>>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005May/0044
>>>
>>>Bottom line: there are a lot of things that would need to be
>>>demonstrated before they feel it is clear that a Binary XML
>>>recommendation would be a good thing.
>>>
>>>Thoughts?
>>
>>Bottom line: they can't make their minds up.
>>
>>So, people who think it's a good idea, Just Do It, and let the market
>>decide.
>>
>>Michael Kay
>>http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
> There are already some solutions available, such as ITU-T X.694 | ISO/IEC
> 8825-5 "Mapping W3C XML schema definitions into ASN.1", which is already
> an International Standard.
More info at:
http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/xml/mapping.htm
> There is also ITU-T X.891 | ISO/IEC
> 24824-1 "Fast Infoset" which is expected to be an International
> Standard by the end of this year. Fast Infoset can handle XML
> documents that do not have a corresponding W3C XML schema.
More info at:
http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/xml/finf.htm
--
Olivier DUBUISSON
France Telecom
Recherche & Developpement
R&D/MAPS/AMS - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
t: +33 2 96 05 38 50 - f: +33 2 96 05 39 45 - http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/
|
