xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interest

Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interest

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interestingpair of comments
From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:29:47 -0700
In-reply-to: <0a0601c5894a$db89bef0$4800000a@objsys1>
References: <20050715083428.A823D48275@metalab.unc.edu> <42D798CD.2020108@metalab.unc.edu> <0a0601c5894a$db89bef0$4800000a@objsys1>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

The obvious case is the ability to edit documents (such as XHTML 
documents) using a schema-specific set of objects. The problem is that 
current OO languages don't support constructs that would make this easy 
to do. Not that I'm saying I know what those would be, either...

-- Ron

Ed Day wrote:
> I am having a hard time accepting the case for mixed content, especially
> based on the arguments I have seen.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev]Interesting pair of comments
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Global Complex Types vs. Global Elements
  - From: "Collin Hsu" <collin@w3china.org>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interestingpair of comments
  - From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interesting pair of comments
  - From: "Ed Day" <eday@obj-sys.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] namespace URI of xmlns prefix
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interesting pair of comments
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Interesting pair of comments
Next by thread: Global Complex Types vs. Global Elements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread