[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, lists@jeffrafter.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces, Xml Schema Whitespace normalization, xs:anyURI, and URILiterals in XPath 2.0
- From: Michele Vivoda <idmichele@yahoo.it>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:47:41 +0200 (CEST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kYvmchuIOzUEuqG2VkQCpSB+8C8Zdf4U5iMAh1RtUC8XluuJzAh+jqAiKGCnI+gwW6A+QeEt3ybGHut9MaEIrxbXJrghJsR02H8zyjlDyzHGdDRsfVoA9O/OSwmCtylvG8ODFeGnE7dOloOPnn08Yh6KSzmKiV6EMnwYIsXscu0= ;
--- Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ha scritto:
> > In this section they talk about whitespace
>
> You're quoting RFC 2396, yes?
Yes, sorry I was in a hurry.
> >
> > 1.6. Syntax Notation and Common Elements
> >
> > This document uses two conventions to describe and
> > define the syntax
> > for URI.
>
> > Whitespace should be
> > ignored.
>
> That's clearly referring to whitespace in the BNF,
> not whitespace in the
> URI.
My mistake. This first part I quoted is,
as you say, talking of the BNF,
I was fast searching to find the Appendix E. space
section and I wrongly included also this,
fascinated by "whitespace" and "removed" words,
I also though, "nice, I didn't see it before",
I usually read the new URI RFC 3986
where this part about the BNF has
been removed, as I said my mistake.
>
> >
> > >In Appendix E: They say it should be removed
> >
>
> The context here is:
>
> URI are often transmitted through formats that do
> not provide a clear
> context for their interpretation. For example,
> there are many
> occasions when URI are included in plain text...
> In some cases, extra whitespace (spaces,
> linebreaks, tabs, etc.) may
> need to be added to break long URI across lines.
> The whitespace
> should be ignored when extracting the URI.
>
> This is clearly not a general recommendation for
> handling of whitespace
> within URIs: it's a recommendation for how URIs
> should be extracted for
> example from the text of an email message.
This was the part I was mainly referring to,
I should have posted only this. It comes from
the URL RFC, is the same in the URL and URI RFC.
If you don't mind, before answering I would like to
ask
if you agree with the following:
-
I thought that this rule from appendix E,
together with the 'represent a space with %20'
rule could be put together as:
seen that spaces are not allowed,
if you find a space just ignore it if you think
that this is allowed for your context,
otherwise is a syntax error.
-
Greetings,
Michele Vivoda
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
|