[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces, Xml Schema Whitespace normalization, xs:anyURI, and URILiterals in XPath 2.0
- From: Michele Vivoda <idmichele@yahoo.it>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:30:18 +0200 (CEST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ycDCApjFokGEbaRHw2uBdY+aujaA7UpQ0f6wk+FDahMPs7TEeRl9RYZltssUtiz7FXfVHe8cGIHhu0HH0IqWT5ICVxbDEFP6ewJbKBWCfG7+orYx0D2229drMDHKcT3gro/qe6R0IL8dHWGJ33rShX6D2VW+NlqLJ1YXAx8kNYI= ;
- In-reply-to: <442B5E93.1040906@allette.com.au>
--- Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> ha
scritto:
> David Carlisle wrote:
>
> >So the choice is; do you make the end user (if it's
> end users creating
> >the xml files) do the %20 escaping, or do you let
> the end user use a
> >space and specify that somewhere along the chain
> between the xml file
> >and the URL resolution the space gets encoded. Just
> simply avoiding
> >them isn't really an option.
> >
> Of course it is an option. For example, people who
> use UNIX shells
> manage to live
> without spaces in file names perfectly well. It is
> prudent not becuase
> everyone will do it,
> but because cautious people will. It is prudent not
> to use a rare
> encoding too.
>
> As a side issue, I don't think "but people will
> always cross the road
> without looking: it is not an option" is no answer
> to a statement like
> "it is prudent for people to look before walking
> across the road."
>
> Cheers
> Rick Jelliffe
And for cars ? ;-)
Gretings
Michele Vivoda
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
|
