[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote:
> I was not refering to usage of CSS in a SVG file but that SVG _is_
> presentational and so harmful as font was. <font> was eliminated from HTML
> last specs, there is no reason for repeataing errors of the past with
> online spreading of p-MathML, SVG, or XSL-FO.
You might consider HTML (without font and other elements) as a semantic
and non-presentational language. But if you compare HTML with more
semantic oriented formats for documents like DocBook or TEI, you will
consider HTML as being very presentational oriented. It depends on where
you draw border line and what level of semantic you expect from your
dataformat.
There is nothing wrong on serving SVG or MathML content to users as long
as you are interested in displaying of information only. If you want
"full access" to information for your users, you can always provide
alternative content in a more semantically rich format. But there should
be set of common formats, which is widely supported and understood.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nejbližší termíny školení:
** XSLT 23.-26.10.2006 ** XML schémata 13.-15.11.2006 **
** DocBook 11.-13.12.2006 ** XSL-FO 11.-12.12.2006 **
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xmlguru.cz Blog mostly about XML for English readers
------------------------------------------------------------------
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
|