OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

>Which style
>and which language does the teacher attempt to use to communicate with the
>students?

Lisp? (sorry, couldn't resist)


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen



On 7/27/06, sterling <sstouden@thelinks.com> wrote:
>
> Pardon the interuption but your post presents differences do exist
> between individuals in preference of one way over another way
> (alternative ways) of doing something.  Hence the technically best way may
> fit the users preferred style?
>
> This might contribute to Visible Web XML inhibition.
>
> Has anyone played around with "preferences" as a programming target.
> It would be really helpful to the long run if a classification system
> could be developed to code delivery styles used in a software package so
> that users could anticipate their ability to cope with them.
>
> In learning science we call it "learning channels". I call it the
> one teacher twenty student problem: several students speak only Spanish, a
> few speak only French, two are deaf, 3 are without eyesight, one is 12
> years old, two are 65 years old, and the minority are normal average
> students (whatever that is) and each student prefers one teaching style to
> another. Two of the students are children of the principal, one is rich,
> most are poor, and until this hour none have been in a class together.
> For this hour the teacher has a choice of 13 teaching styles.  Which style
> and which language does the teacher attempt to use to communicate with the
> students?
>
> sterling
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, bryan rasmussen wrote:
>
> > Well, Relax-NG IMHO is easier to write, and provides better
> > extensibility mechanisms for ones dialect so even for data oriented
> > xml I suppose it is better. The only way it wouldn't be better would
> > be if people are interested in exchanging mechanisms via SOAP based
> > WebServices and have decided that they need all the overhead required
> > for that - for example, XSD, WSDL, maybe WS-* even...
> >
> > Please note that I don't understand why anyone would make that
> > decision although I see it made quite often.
> >
> > MVH
> > Bryan Rasmussen
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> wrote:
> > > Relevant to discussions earlier this month...  Is the tide turning?
> > >
> > > For background, IETF's XCON effort is for controlling operations within a
> > > videoconference, for example participants' audio gains, side bar
> > > conversations etc.
> > >
> > > I think the proposal follows a similar move in the ECRIT group (which I'm
> > > not familiar with).
> > >
> > > XCON seems very data oriented, but I've heard that Relax NG is not suited to
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Mull?
> > >
> > > Pete.
> > > --
> > > =============================================
> > > Pete Cordell
> > > Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
> > >                          for XML to C++ data binding visit
> > >                          http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
> > >                          (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
> > > =============================================
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Adam Roach" <...>
> > > To: "XCON-IETF" <xcon@ietf.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:18 PM
> > > Subject: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
> > >
> > >
> > > > Spurred by the output from the data model editing session, the working
> > > > group members present at the IETF 66 meeting of XCON discussed the
> > > > potential use of Relax NG instead of Schema for defining the XCON data
> > > > model.
> > > >
> > > > Among participants in the discussion, there was strong agreement to use
> > > > Relax NG for the XCON data model.
> > > >
> > > > This message is to confirm that this direction has the consensus of the
> > > > mailing list. Any objections to the decision should be raised promptly on
> > > > the XCON mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > /a
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > XCON mailing list
> > > > XCON@ietf.org
> > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> > >
> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> >
>
>




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS