[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Pardon the interuption but your post presents differences do exist
between individuals in preference of one way over another way
(alternative ways) of doing something. Hence the technically best way may
fit the users preferred style?
This might contribute to Visible Web XML inhibition.
Has anyone played around with "preferences" as a programming target.
It would be really helpful to the long run if a classification system
could be developed to code delivery styles used in a software package so
that users could anticipate their ability to cope with them.
In learning science we call it "learning channels". I call it the
one teacher twenty student problem: several students speak only Spanish, a
few speak only French, two are deaf, 3 are without eyesight, one is 12
years old, two are 65 years old, and the minority are normal average
students (whatever that is) and each student prefers one teaching style to
another. Two of the students are children of the principal, one is rich,
most are poor, and until this hour none have been in a class together.
For this hour the teacher has a choice of 13 teaching styles. Which style
and which language does the teacher attempt to use to communicate with the
students?
sterling
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, bryan rasmussen wrote:
> Well, Relax-NG IMHO is easier to write, and provides better
> extensibility mechanisms for ones dialect so even for data oriented
> xml I suppose it is better. The only way it wouldn't be better would
> be if people are interested in exchanging mechanisms via SOAP based
> WebServices and have decided that they need all the overhead required
> for that - for example, XSD, WSDL, maybe WS-* even...
>
> Please note that I don't understand why anyone would make that
> decision although I see it made quite often.
>
> MVH
> Bryan Rasmussen
>
> On 7/27/06, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> wrote:
> > Relevant to discussions earlier this month... Is the tide turning?
> >
> > For background, IETF's XCON effort is for controlling operations within a
> > videoconference, for example participants' audio gains, side bar
> > conversations etc.
> >
> > I think the proposal follows a similar move in the ECRIT group (which I'm
> > not familiar with).
> >
> > XCON seems very data oriented, but I've heard that Relax NG is not suited to
> > this.
> >
> > Mull?
> >
> > Pete.
> > --
> > =============================================
> > Pete Cordell
> > Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
> > for XML to C++ data binding visit
> > http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
> > (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
> > =============================================
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Adam Roach" <...>
> > To: "XCON-IETF" <xcon@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:18 PM
> > Subject: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
> >
> >
> > > Spurred by the output from the data model editing session, the working
> > > group members present at the IETF 66 meeting of XCON discussed the
> > > potential use of Relax NG instead of Schema for defining the XCON data
> > > model.
> > >
> > > Among participants in the discussion, there was strong agreement to use
> > > Relax NG for the XCON data model.
> > >
> > > This message is to confirm that this direction has the consensus of the
> > > mailing list. Any objections to the decision should be raised promptly on
> > > the XCON mailing list.
> > >
> > > /a
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > XCON mailing list
> > > XCON@ietf.org
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
|
