[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
sterling wrote:
>Pardon the interuption but your post presents differences do exist
>between individuals in preference of one way over another way
>(alternative ways) of doing something. Hence the technically best way may
>fit the users preferred style?
>
>This might contribute to Visible Web XML inhibition.
>
>Has anyone played around with "preferences" as a programming target.
>It would be really helpful to the long run if a classification system
>could be developed to code delivery styles used in a software package so
>that users could anticipate their ability to cope with them.
>
>In learning science we call it "learning channels". I call it the
>one teacher twenty student problem: several students speak only Spanish, a
>few speak only French, two are deaf, 3 are without eyesight, one is 12
>years old, two are 65 years old, and the minority are normal average
>students (whatever that is) and each student prefers one teaching style to
>another. Two of the students are children of the principal, one is rich,
>most are poor, and until this hour none have been in a class together.
>For this hour the teacher has a choice of 13 teaching styles. Which style
>and which language does the teacher attempt to use to communicate with the
>students?
>
>
everything is wrong so any style is correct :)
>
>sterling
>
>On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, bryan rasmussen wrote:
>
>
>
>>Well, Relax-NG IMHO is easier to write, and provides better
>>extensibility mechanisms for ones dialect so even for data oriented
>>xml I suppose it is better. The only way it wouldn't be better would
>>be if people are interested in exchanging mechanisms via SOAP based
>>WebServices and have decided that they need all the overhead required
>>for that - for example, XSD, WSDL, maybe WS-* even...
>>
>>Please note that I don't understand why anyone would make that
>>decision although I see it made quite often.
>>
>>MVH
>>Bryan Rasmussen
>>
>>On 7/27/06, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Relevant to discussions earlier this month... Is the tide turning?
>>>
>>>For background, IETF's XCON effort is for controlling operations within a
>>>videoconference, for example participants' audio gains, side bar
>>>conversations etc.
>>>
>>>I think the proposal follows a similar move in the ECRIT group (which I'm
>>>not familiar with).
>>>
>>>XCON seems very data oriented, but I've heard that Relax NG is not suited to
>>>this.
>>>
>>>Mull?
>>>
>>>Pete.
>>>--
>>>=============================================
>>>Pete Cordell
>>>Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
>>> for XML to C++ data binding visit
>>> http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
>>> (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
>>>=============================================
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Adam Roach" <...>
>>>To: "XCON-IETF" <xcon@ietf.org>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:18 PM
>>>Subject: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Spurred by the output from the data model editing session, the working
>>>>group members present at the IETF 66 meeting of XCON discussed the
>>>>potential use of Relax NG instead of Schema for defining the XCON data
>>>>model.
>>>>
>>>>Among participants in the discussion, there was strong agreement to use
>>>>Relax NG for the XCON data model.
>>>>
>>>>This message is to confirm that this direction has the consensus of the
>>>>mailing list. Any objections to the decision should be raised promptly on
>>>>the XCON mailing list.
>>>>
>>>>/a
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>XCON mailing list
>>>>XCON@ietf.org
>>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>>>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>>>
>>>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>>>
>>>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>>>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>>
>>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>!DSPAM:44c8b031175707955413084!
>
>
>
|
