[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] XML-DEV list
- From: Ben Trafford <ben@prodigal.ca>
- To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:19:55 -0400
At 10:29 PM 9/27/2006, Len Bullard wrote:
>My problem with that description is how many web programmers or designers
>are willing to suggest or document solutions without doing the research into
>the topic to discover what solutions have been tried and what the results
>were. Two very serious problems emerge out of that: claiming credit where
>there is prior art making the IP situation difficult for everyone, and
>claims that lead to false eigen-index locking (the Google/Wikipedia effect).
From what I've seen, there's arguably prior art on virtually
any idea you put forth, these days. I have very little fears on that
front -- trying to fight a patent against an open linking standard
would be awfully rough going for whomever tried it. Moreover, nothing
I'm doing is really new -- it's more of a remix of existing ideas,
with a bit of glue. Also, everything I've taken from comes from open standards.
As for people willing to put forward solutions without the
research -- well. I'm of two minds on that one. On one hand, I agree
that people need to be relatively rigorous in their research (which
is another reason this is taking me awhile to finish -- there's a lot
of history in hyperlinks). The other part of me applauds the web
programmers and designers for at least -trying-, where so many others
are just content to bitch and moan, without actually doing anything.
I'm with Teddy Roosevelt on this one: "It is not the critic
who counts...The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the
arena." I've got a lot more respect for people who try to address a
problem, even if their solution is wrong, or ill-researched, or
naive, than people who just sit back and complain.
>I expect to see 42 pages with the last two being citations of work both in
>URIs and bibliographic.
Those resources will certainly be present, Len. They were in
place long before you brought them up. But thanks for the reminder. I
have actually been doing this awhile, you know?
:^)
--->Ben
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]