[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:47:01 -0400
Several people have proposed that vendors be required to join the
process 45 days, six months, a year or whatever before the vote to avoid
these sorts of shenanigans. I think that's still open to abuse. I would
propose an alternative procedure:
Anyone (natural person, not company) voting on a proposed standard
should be required to affirm, under oath, that either:
1. They have read the entire standard and feel they understand what it says.
or
2. They have read the entire standard, and feel that it is
incomprehensible in significant respects.
Of course, affirming #2 would only be consistent with a No vote. This
would deter people from jumping in at the last minute to vote on a
standard just to support their friends and partners. As a side effect,
it would also encourage smaller, more modular, more comprehensible
standards. How many people have really read the entire OOXML spec? or
the entire XQuery specs? And personally six years in, I still don't feel
like I fully understand the W3C Schema specs, despite having read them
end-to-end multiple times and even written books about them.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]