Original Message From: "Liam Quin"See my proposal from yesterday that allowed partial namespaces (http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200908/msg00033.html ).
Donkeys can't type very fast... I can see there there might be pushback
for this proposal on the grounds that it's considerably more verbose
than most other current proposals, with the exception of the {...}
syntax...
If you make the namespace more obviously separable from the local name, (for example, by using a : rather than another .), then the XML parser can be informed as a local implementation that namespace org.ietf.html is an alias of namespace org.w3.html (or better still, namespace html.ietf.org is an alias of namespace html.w3.org). So when the parser encounters <body:html.ietf.org> it can return the equivalent of <body:html.w3.org>.
also, it can't easily be made compatible with
things like ch.cern.html (later org.ietf.html, and then org.w3.html,
of course, and also ch.iso.html...)
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php