RE: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

["David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>]

I'd even argue for a minimum *without attributes* and without mixed content,
no DTD subset, no namespaces, and only UTF8 support.

A processor (parser/ language binding etc) for such a minimum would be much
smaller, possibly "JavaScript" small/fast,
and on equal footing with JSON.

It would still be "XML" (i.e. parseable by full parsers) but vastly useful
on its own.


----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
dlee@calldei.com
http://www.xmlsh.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:36 AM
To: Pete Cordell
Cc: David Lee; vojtech.toman@emc.com; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0


> And presumably it still requires processing of internal DTD for attribute
> default values and so on?
>
> The profiles seem more like XML 1.0 + XML Namespaces + other additional
> profile specific stuff, rather than simplifications.  Personally it's not
> what I'm looking for.

Nor me... I think the absolute minimum... just elements, attributes
and angle brackets :)

That's the tag line anyway.


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com