[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
- From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
- To: "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:40:02 +0000
> A W3C community group would be a fine place to discuss requirements and
> use cases and get a draft hammered out. Or maybe I'm biased there :)
>
> Liam
>
> --
I agree !
But ... to test the water, while I am technically interested I step and ask myself "Why MicroXML?"
Is there really such a dearth of full XML processors that MicroXML has value over simply coding to simpler XML by convention ?
Noone is making you use the full (and ugly?) breath of XML in your documents - and (IMHO) Unlike SGML, there is a *plethora* of full XML parsers and processors available,
yea even in the Browser.
So ... partially as devil's advocate, but also to question why put so much effort into a new standard if simply ad-hoc subsetting of the one we have would suffice
"Why not just use XML ?" Or for that matter, JSON. What is the value add of a *new* standard.
-David
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]