On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:
The Goths were not people to adhere to the formal social conventions of
other groups, I think. The Goth approach to markup would be to demolish
it and to take what they could from it and move on, perhaps :-)
Formal XML markup is closer to the Roman Empire, whose organization was
powered by bureaucracy and whose buildings, ideas, language and even
their legal systems endured long after their socks had crumbled to dust.Right-O. "I am heere with thee, and thy Goats, as the mostcapricious Poet honest Ovid was among the Goths" (sith a Foole a Foole a motley Foole).
"At the present rate, God knows when I'll get time for anything but war and politics, neither of which is my proper trade."
"What is, then?"
"I was a gatherer of facts; a kind of historian of periods that had no history. I suppose you could call me a historical philosopher."
"You're a fascinating person, Martinus. I can see why they call you Mysterious. But if you don't like war and politics, why do you engage in them?"
"That would be hard to explain, my lady. In the course of my work in my own country, I had occasion to study the rise and fall of many civilizations. In looking around me here, I see many symptoms of a fall."
"Really? That's a strange thing to say. Of course, my own people, and barbarians like the Franks, have occupied most of the Western Empire. But they're not a danger to civilization. They protect it from the real wild men like the Bulgarian Huns and the Slavs. I can't think of a time when our western culture was more secure."
"You're entitled to your opinion, my lady," said Padway. "I merely put together such facts as I have, and draw what conclusions I can. Facts such as the decline in the population of Italy, despite the Gothic immigrations. And such things as the volume of shipping."
"Shipping? I never thought of measuring civilization that way. But in any event, that doesn't answer my question."
"Triggws, to use one of your own Gothic words."
Agreed, but what was that [1] you intended? Surely not MicroXML?