← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
More comments on ODF 1.0 2nd errata?
On our last TC call we planned to move the draft of the 2nd Errata for
ODF 1.0 to a CD vote at our next TC meeting.
There have been four comments so far on the errata02 only from Patrick:
Comment:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00250.html
Amendment: Changed second column header from 'Section Refinement' to
'Sub Heading'
Comment:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00252.html
Amendment: In
15.14.12 changed 'repeated' to 'repeat'
Comment:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00253.html
Amendment: Shall there be an editors action?
Comment:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00289.html
Amendment: No Action so far, shall we change the wording in ODF 1.0
that the feature is 'implementation dependent'?
If so, I would move those notes into the table with a changed wording.
Any further comment on errata and on above 3. & 4.?
Regards,
Svante
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread