[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- To: peter@ursus.demon.co.uk
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 00:32:31 +0100 (BST)
Peter Murray-Rust writes:
> I particularly agree with the last two goals FOP is already almost usable
> for some purposes - Michael Wright - working with Henry Rzepa has written a
> 60 page thesis in XML (about, and featuring, CML], transformed to XSL-FO
> and rendered (in print) with FOP.
I'd be interested to see a comparison between this 60 page document
rendered with XSLFO/FOP, and the same document rendered using
XML+CSS, and a good browser's print engine.
>It looks very attractive and (IMO) no
> less presentable than many Word documents.
if `as good as Word' is the target, then the XSL FO team are *way* out
of line in their work :-}
Sebastian Rahtz
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
- References:
- FOs again
- From: Amy Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
- Re: FOs again
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
|