[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:34:38 +0000
"Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> writes:
> > No clear what you mean by a "scheme [sic]"?
> >
> > I'd certainly be interested in a bit more detail on why it's obvious
> > that XML Schema is not appropriate for your needs.
>
> I'm not saying it isn't appropriate: far from it! Rather I'm asking "is it
> appropriate?"
> By Scheme, I mean:
> "Syntactic Schema: A document, real or imagined, which constrains the
> structure and/or type of data. (pl.: Schemata)." - Tim Berners-Lee,
> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Evolution.html
So by Scheme you meant Schema :-)
I encourage you to read the XML Schema Primer [1], which contains a good
introduction to the mechanisms by which you can associate schemas with
namespaces -- putting a schema document at the namespace URI is only
one of them. I think there's enough flexibility in the spec. to
accommodate your needs.
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
|