[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
- From: Francis Norton <email@example.com>
- To: Steve Muench <Steve.Muench@oracle.com>,"Clark C. Evans" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 13:27:48 +0000
Francis Norton wrote:
> > <xsl:script> itself, allows *any* language's code,
> > not just ecmascript and java. I consider separately
> > the question of whether the XSL 1.1 WD should change
> > to allow *only*
> > <xsl:script language="qname-but-not-ncname">
> > instead of
> > <xsl:script language="java | ecmascript | QName-but-not-NCName">
> > removing the two "shortcut/builtin" names.
> I don't consider this a separate question - to me, it is the single most
> obnoxious aspect of xsl:script. If you make this change, what does
> compelling advantage does xsl:script offer over community-based
> extensions such as exsl?
Sorry - was reading the thread in reverse order. You did indeed consider
the question seperately.