[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
- From: David Megginson <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 20:30:26 -0500
Thomas B. Passin writes:
> Yes, but ... What can be good is to anticipate what you think is
> likely to come and then to make sure the design can support it when
> you do decide to implement.
RSS 1.0 gets that for free through its use of Namespaces and RDF. It
has a well-defined path for backwards-compatible future upgrades, and
new features will always be easy to distinguish from current ones.
All the best,
David Megginson email@example.com