[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
- From: Alaric Snell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:14:46 +0100 (BST)
Quoting David Brownell <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> that the fix still facilitates significant amounts of work being done by
> transforms. CPP has done #includes as stream operations for decades,
> and I'm not sure I see why doing it in XML ought to be different.
I always that that XML including would "obviously" be a processing instruction
<?xml-include uri="http://www.foo.bar.com/fiddle.xml#...xpointer or whatever..."
- if not, then what ARE processing instructions for?
> - Dave
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software