[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
- From: Peter Flynn <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:21:03 +0100
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Alaric Snell wrote:
> Quoting David Brownell <email@example.com>:
> > One
> > hopes
> > that the fix still facilitates significant amounts of work being done by
> > stream
> > transforms. CPP has done #includes as stream operations for decades,
> > and I'm not sure I see why doing it in XML ought to be different.
> I always that that XML including would "obviously" be a processing instruction
> issue, myself.
> <?xml-include uri="http://www.foo.bar.com/fiddle.xml#...xpointer or whatever..."
> - if not, then what ARE processing instructions for?
PIs are for passing procedural instructions through XML to a
post-processor. They are not intended for consumption and
action by the XML processor itself in any way that would affect
the integrity of the document.
For example you can encode a forced line-break in a title that
you know will be required when the document is typeset but which
you don't wish to hard-code wrt the document structure:
<title>How I Made <?LaTeX \\?>A Million Dollars</title>