[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Blueberry
- From: David Carlisle <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:17:28 +0100
] The major problem is that when
] it appears in a tag, e.g.
] <t a1="1"
] (where there's a NEL after the "1") then the XML processor will kick
] this out. -Tim
Do any files really use NEL that are encoded in utf-8 or utf-16 (or
utf-8 subsets like ascii that don't need to be declared)?
If all the files using NEL start
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="some-flavour-of-ebcdic"?>
Then can't NEL be mapped to #10 (0r #13) in the non normative support
for the ebcdic related encodings. This wouldn't require any change to XML.
this would mean that NEL and CR would be mapped to the same unicode
point but this wouldn't be much of a loss, if NEL was added as a line
end character as propsed in Blueberry it would presumably (?) be normalised
along with the other line ends to #10. (section 2.11)
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.