[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Blueberry
- From: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- To: David Carlisle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:02:50 -0400
David Carlisle wrote:
> Do any files really use NEL that are encoded in utf-8 or utf-16 (or
> utf-8 subsets like ascii that don't need to be declared)?
> If all the files using NEL start
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="some-flavour-of-ebcdic"?>
> Then can't NEL be mapped to #10 (0r #13) in the non normative support
> for the ebcdic related encodings. This wouldn't require any change to XML.
But it does require two different kinds of EBCDIC mapping: one for XML,
one for every other kind of text. This is highly unsavory.
> [I]f NEL was added as a line
> end character as propsed in Blueberry it would presumably (?) be normalised
> along with the other line ends to #10. (section 2.11)
There is / one art || John Cowan <email@example.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein