[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguous Content Model
- From: Mark Endicott <MEndicott@telapoint.com>
- To: "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:49:04 -0400
Hi all.
I have been lurking for a while, but this is my first post. I appologize in
advance for any etiquite violations!
It appears to me that (A,B)*, A? isn't impossible. Wouldn't this lead to the
following list of possible child elements?
(no children)
A
A, B
A, B, A
A, B, A, B
A, B, A, B, A
...
This pattern is specified by (A,B)* | (A, (B, A)*).
-----Original Message-----
From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 7:27 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguous Content Model
> > Niiice! You da man Rick. Back to logic class for me. :-) World o'
> > thanks.
>
> I think Marcus Carr mentioned a difficult one: ( A, B)*, A?
I thought it was me but anyway, this is not a difficult one; this is an
impossible one.