[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>
To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Formal definition of PSVI (was [xml-dev] Where have the
element types gone?)
>
> I am not saying that it's easy to follow ;=) , but descriptions of the
> PSVI are scatered all over the W3C XML Schema recommendation, such as
> (to take the first example which comes in part 1):
>
Until you mentioned this I hadn't put all of it together but on taking a
further look at the structures part of the schema recommendation I came across
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#PSVI_contributions
which is enough to clarify what PSVI means, at least to me.
>
> Otherwise, if you want to see angle brackets, Richard Tobin and Henry
> Thompson have published a "a first cut at an XML serialisation of the
> (PSV) Infoset" which is non normative but gives a more concrete idea of
> what the beast looks like:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/05/serialized-infoset-schema.html
>
> Hope this helps!
>
I came across this in the past but couldn't make much sense of it primarily
because I found it before reading the infoset spec or noticing the PSVI
contributions sections of the schema recommendation. Now it makes more sense
and of course launches a new set of questions which I'm sure many have heard
before. :)
So what exactly is the consesus opinion of the W3C or members of xml-dev as to
how the PSVI data of a document is attached to it to avoid revalidation on
subsequent requests for PSVI data if the document has not been modified since
the last request?
--
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #67
No matter how many shorts we have in the system, my guards will be
instructed to treat every surveillance camera malfunction as a full-scale
emergency.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
