[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> There is nothing preventing you from doing this today as part of your
> local processes. You can take document A, merge the XIncludes to
> produce document B, and then validate, canonicalize, encrypt, and/or
> digitally sign document A and/or document B. Each process will have
> the clear and unambiguous result defined by the specs.
Sure, but it might be interesting to do it in an interchangeable way.
> Just don't tell me that document A and document B are the same thing,
> or expect that I will be satisfied with working only with document B
> and never want to touch document A.
I really don't understand what you want to show here.
I won't take the risk of saying if A and B are the same document without
a defininition of when documents are "the same".
And if I have my local process to produce document B and if document B
is the interchange format which we've agreed to use, the way I am
producing it is my own business.
Eric
--
See you in Seattle.
http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
