xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:19:17 +0200
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3D00EEEE.2020303@datapower.com>

Okay the quote "Had XML Schema been done in 1998, we would not have done
SOAP," makes me wonder why not? Is it because with XML Schema being the
"..foundation for the rest of XML" no one is going to want to build
anything in any way ambitious cause it's just too painful?

Ooh I feel bad.

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
Next by thread: Actually, resistance is proving far from futile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread