OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

6/10/2002 11:23:06 AM, "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com> wrote:

>. Perhaps my choice of the term 'political' was incorrect. 
> Indeed 'self preserving' and 'self perpetuating' 
> are better words to use to  describe the current 
> W3C processes 

I think that's a proper use of the word "political" -- we say that
a decision was "political" if it appeared to be more based on 
considerations of perpetuating or advancing someone's position 
of authority in a government, company, or organization than in 
reaching the collective goals.  

Nevertheless, I think in the W3C Schema case, the motivations are
more subtle.  I agree with John Cowan's assessment:

"self-censorship ("gotta use the official schema language, even 
if we think it sux") MAY be operating here."

It's sortof meta-politics -- "if we open that can of worms, we'll
get into some really ugly politics, so let's not open it."  
The result is a strongly conservative desire to move forward
without breaking anything.  Unfortunately, there are areas in which 
this just isn't possible -- schema languages and the irreconciliable
differences between the DOM and XPath data models come to mind.
Some bones are going to have to be re-broken and re-set cleanly for
XML to walk without a limp. [Sorry!]

There are other areas where there may be more ability to reconcile 
positions that seemed to be irreconciliable, for example SOAP and
REST can probably be subsumed under an overall web services 


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS