RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

["Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@comcast.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 5:47 AM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
> 
> 
> [bryan]
> 
> > Finally the fact that .Net users use it all the time; does 
> this apply 
> > to Schemas that they generate for instance documents - 
> forgive me here 
> > I seem to remember seeing a schema generator for VS.Net 
> sometime, as I 
> > just use the Framework I'm unfamiliar with the functionalities of 
> > VS.Net
> > - does it apply to Schemas that others have written, or 
> does it apply to
> > Schemas that they themselves author? I submit that if it 
> applies to the
> > second then the "accounting" for development time could be 
> screwed up
> > without accurate measurement of time taken to write the 
> schema, which I
> > bet could have been more quickly written in another language.
> 
> Here's how it works in .NET, including .NET Studio.  

<snip description of building web services using Visual Studio.NET /> 

When I said .NET users use this all the time, I was talking about data
binding using XML Serialization. Although you are right to mention Web
Services which I overlooked since I don't use them nor am I a member of
the team that works on them. 

MSDN DOCS FOR XML SERIALIZATION IN .NET: 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconserialization.
asp 

CODE SAMPLES: 
http://www.gotdotnet.com/quickstart/howto/doc/xmlserialization/XSDFromCl
s.aspx

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The shortest distance between two points is under repair.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.