[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Seems this argument is going to make the rounds every couple of weeks or so.
The arguments (and contestants) are too predictable anymore. I'm still
waiting for the definitive answer on why DTD's are not the answer. Seems to
me they are damn good at modeling information systems. I'm just a lowly
business major and I can understand them and model with them. Ooops,
probably just answered my own question. Why use something simple when
something 5000 times more obtuse will do the job? Sheesh!
Take Care,
mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
Sent: 21 June 2002 14:48
To: Roger L. Costello; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
>Is WXS a good starting point for information processing? I think it's a
>horrible set of tools to use for anything other than kluging information in
>forms that unfortunate people who fall for the "it's so object-oriented" or
>"it's so convenient for relational DB work" lines can do.
>Given my lack of respect for WXS, it doesn't really matter to me whether
>RNG is a good starting point for that distinctly rotten endpoint. It makes
>much more sense for me to be blunt about WXS and hope that more people take
>a critical look at WXS than to blindly support tools I consider dangerous
>to the health of the XML ecosystems in which I work.
|
