Lists Home |
Date Index |
> Thomas B. Passin wrote
> > Plus, xhtml with short tags wouldn't work in standard browsers.
> Are you suggesting that standard browser compatibility is a reasonable
> criteria for judging future modifications to XML? If so, I wonder how XML
> 1.1  will fair.
I think that's exactly what is should be expected from xhtml. So if there
were optional features that would cause the parse to fail, there would have
to be a capability to turn them off. More complexity.