xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to a

Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to a

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:58:55 +0100
References: <4.2.0.58.20020623163907.03bd6f10@pop3.east.ora.com> <4.2.0.58.20020623172350.03d1acf0@pop3.east.ora.com> <019c01c21aff$bb76c160$0200a8c0@elcel.ldn> <002401c21b35$d225bb60$961b3044@reston01.va.comcast.net>

Thomas B. Passin wrote
> Plus, xhtml with short tags wouldn't work in standard browsers.

Are you suggesting that standard browser compatibility is a reasonable
criteria for judging future modifications to XML?  If so, I wonder how XML
1.1 [1] will fair.

Regards
~Rob

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
  - From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread