xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?

Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: XML DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:11:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <3E635BC1.C363E559@fiduciary.com>
References: <E18oMGa-0005t3-00@mercury.ccil.org><p04330102ba83b5f45841@[192.168.254.4]><02ff01c2e14f$9d880bc0$6401a8c0@tbp1><3E630C7D.7080906@textuality.com><15971.20891.679398.75447@megginson.com><3E635BC1.C363E559@fiduciary.com>

W. E. Perry writes:

 > This seems like the converse of XQuery: i.e., instead of an XML
 > view over a relational database, an application-specific mapping
 > for instantiating the parse of an XML instance to a relational
 > schema.

I don't know if I'd take a strictly relational approach for an XML
data layer.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, david@megginson.com, http://www.megginson.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
  - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
  - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread