xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?

Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:03:13 +0100
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <f5by8sibpmu.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>
References: <4C4EB02E-4177-11D8-A4BC-000A95BA5A2C@openhealth.org> <p06010201bc22855ac223@[192.168.254.4]> <f5br7yaeoug.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk> <1073557553.6359.122.camel@delleric> <f5by8sibpmu.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

* Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> If the W3C has another definition of what are URIs and URI references
>> than the IETF
>
>It doesn't.

They rather want to change the IETF definition... See
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Jan/0005>.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>

References:
- Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread