[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Le dimanche 25 juin 2006 à 16:58 +1000, Rick Jelliffe a écrit :
> Eric van der Vlist said:
> > Le dimanche 25 juin 2006 à 00:48 +1000, Rick Jelliffe a écrit :
> >
> >> I don't see why not. Links are important and interesting and difficult
> >> and
> >> error-prone; all good reasons at least to look around at industry
> >> experience.
> >
> > I meant that it wasn't clear for me whether the scope of DSDL part 6
> > includes the validation of the global model resulting from recursively
> > dereferencing the links and applying custom consolidation rules.
> >
> > For instance, would it be in the scope of DSDL Part 6 to validate that a
> > RELAX NG schema with its include and externalRef is complete and that
> > there is no duplicates in its definitions?
>
> It is a gap at the moment with all validation languages, and Part 6 is a
> blank slate.
If it can be considered in scope, we could consider the validation of
consolidated RELAX NG, XSLT and W3C XML Schema as three use cases.
Eric
--
GPG-PGP: 2A528005
Freelance consulting and training.
http://dyomedea.com/english/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
|
