[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Feasibility of "do all application coding in the XML languages"?
- From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- To: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:58:34 -0500
Dimitre,
I have to confess even after reading the code, I don't understand it.
Can you supply an example invocation using a simple input example,
and expected output?
I am definitely interested in anything that helps broaden the
possible inputs to XSLT!
Cheers,
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitre Novatchev [mailto:dnovatchev@gmail.com]
> Sent: December 2, 2008 11:57 PM
> To: Rushforth, Peter
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org; Costello, Roger L.
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Feasibility of "do all application
> coding in the XML languages"?
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Rushforth, Peter
> <Peter.Rushforth@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> > I think there's a lot of value in such interfaces. It
> would be nice
> > if it didn't involve having to write a parser each time,
> but the cost
> > is not too high, I think
>
> The cost is not high, especially if one uses a general and
> portable native XSLT 2.0 parser writing tool, such as the
> LR(1) Parsing Framework of FXSL,
>
>
> http://fxsl.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fxsl/fxsl-xslt2/f/func-
> lrParse.xsl?revision=1.7&view=markup&sortby=date
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant
> intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know
> whether what you're doing is work or play
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]