Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

[Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com>]

So you are suggesting that something that looks like an element is
parsed differently to other things that look like elements?  Is "can't
expect well-formedness" entirely wise?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> wrote:
> On 12/4/2010 10:39 PM, Ben Trafford wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 22:16 -0500, Kurt Cagle wrote:
>>>
>>>         For a comment syntax, what's wrong with
>>>         <xml:comment>....</xml:comment>?
>>>
>>> But that's ... that's ...
>>>
>>>
>>> That's actually a very decent idea.
>>
>> I'll third that.
>>
>> --->Ben
>
> metoo, but let's please allow for nesting this time.  Extremely useful, and
> not too hard to implement if you parse the contents of the comment loosely
> (can't expect well-formedness, but can just search for </xml:comment\s*>)
>
> -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>